Showing posts sorted by date for query human-technology interaction. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query human-technology interaction. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Cyber-Physical System Approach To Smart Grids



    What Are Smart Grids?

    Smart grids are electric grids that use sophisticated monitoring, control, and communication technology to deliver dependable and secure electricity, increase system efficiency, and give flexibility to prosumers. 

    The advent of the smart grid era, as well as advancements in contemporary infrastructures for metering, communication, and energy storage, has transformed the power grid. 

    Smart grids are created using complicated physical networks and cyber technologies, allowing smart grids to be used in the Internet of Energy (IoE)



    IoE is the cloud in which intelligent sources of power production and loads of power consumption are incorporated. 

    Sensors are installed into modern electric power systems to give measurements. 

    Sensor measurements, as well as the sophisticated uses of numerous sensors, need the employment of a Cyber-Physical System (CPS)

    CPS is a system type that combines physical processes, computing, and networking. 

    The smart grid CPS model aids in modelling and simulation for evaluating system performance and characteristics. 

    The smart grid's CPS model must be resilient, allow for future additions, and be compatible with web service technologies. 

    The physical layers of the smart grid include electricity generating sources and loads such as smart buildings, the cyber-physical integration is formed by sensors used for measurements, and the cyber layer is formed by data storage and processing utilizing IOE. 

    The smart grid CPS model aids in the integration of intelligent devices and related information and communication technologies for resilient and dependable smart grid operation. 

    The energy management system is critical in the smart grid paradigm for increasing system efficiency and reliability. 

    This article describes a CPS model for smart grids as well as the obstacles related with its development. 

    Furthermore, this article discusses the smart grid's energy management system paradigm.





    What Is The History Of Smart Grids?


    The complex interactive network was the first study carried out by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) in 1998 for constructing a fully automated dependable grid, which is the first smart grid prototype. 

    Following Intelli-suggestion Grid's in 2002, the smart grid idea was largely adopted for the future development of electricity networks. 

    In 2005, the European Smart-Grids Technology Platform was established, and in 2006, a study containing ideas and a framework for the European smart grid was released. 

    The US Department of Energy revised this research in 2007 to promote a stable and sustainable energy supply in the report "The Smart Grid." Many nations' key task is to establish a smart city with socioeconomic and environmental advantages, as well as to improve power consumption in a smarter manner to preserve energy. 

    In recent years, there has been a rise in demand for electric energy, with load patterns growing more complicated, posing a challenge to the power grid network. 

    To overcome these issues, power engineers and academics introduced the CPS strategy for the power system network. 



    The Cyber-Physical Energy Systems (CPES) are a mix of a cyber-physical system and a power system network. 

    The measurements from the sensors are used to make the choice to execute the control in the distributed network. 

    The integration of cyber and physical components in the system is the most difficult problem in CPES. 

    For a unified functioning of cyber and physical layer components in the CPES, all events occurring and choices made must be communicated between cyber and physical layer components, boosting the system's potential to resolve difficulties. 

    The development of smart sensors and their integration into the electric grid guarantees that original and reliable data is available at control centers. 

    The use of genuine, trustworthy data improves the precision with which issues are solved and control is applied in a variety of applications. 

    The current electric grid incorporates a greater quantity of renewable energy, which is not properly managed owing to the intermittent availability of renewable energy. 

    This difficulty inspires the notion of a smart grid with upgraded infrastructure for communication and computing in the traditional grid. 

    The current smart grid apps lack an underlying framework, resulting in isolation and making integration and future growth difficult. 

    The smart grid may be constructed more effectively with the aid of a CPES reference model. 

    The CPES reference model must handle large-scale and long-term smart grid scenarios. 

    The CPES model must be a general model that represents the features of the smart grid scenario using smart grid technology and standards. 

    The primary goal of power engineers is to create an efficient algorithm that can operate in real time in the grid. 

    Another challenge for power engineers is the extraordinary amount of data collected by the Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU), which must be gathered and processed according to the requirements. 

    The coordination of dispersed resources is critical to the grid's real-time functioning. 

    The grid's communication network must be upgraded in order to manage the grid's coordinated functioning. 

    The infrastructure consists of a communication network and middleware, which includes software for data processing and control deployment. 

    The diagram below depicts the structure of a typical electricity network. 



    This article provides an overview of CPS as well as a summary of research in cyber-physical energy systems. 

    The purpose of this article is to assist power engineers and researchers in understanding the CPS approach to power grids. 



    What are the various definitions of a  SMART GRID across geographies?


    Smart grid (SG) is a phrase that has many meanings. 

    The definition of SG is the integration and enablement of information and communications technology (ICT) and advanced technologies with power networks in order to make the power system efficient, affordable, and sustainable. 

    In the United States, SG refers to the process of converting the electric industry from a centralized, producer-controlled network to a consumer-controlled network. 

    SG in Europe refers to the involvement and integration of all European societies

    SG refers to a physical network-based method to ensuring security, dependability, and sustainability in China. 

    The need of SG in IEEE Grid Vision 2050 is to run and manage the whole power system, which includes all current and future technologies. 

    The need for flexible, portable, safe, and secure power supply utilization through SG necessitates a rethinking of the interplay between physical power systems, cyber systems, and users. 

    The issues with SGs include the intermittent nature of renewable generating, which impacts power quality and system stability. 

    Peak demand plays an important role in electricity consumption; lowering peak demand improves supply capacity without adding additional generating units. 

    Power losses in SGs may be reduced by eliminating long-distance transmission lines owing to the use of dispersed generating. 

    The use of smart meters, modern sensors, and ICT aids in the improvement of SG efficiency. 


    What are the characteristics of a smart grid?


    To accomplish all of the aforementioned benefits, the SGs must have the following characteristics: 


    • Distributed control 

    • Load forecasting 

    • Renewable generation forecasting 

    • Peak demand reduction

     • Energy storage system 

    The CPS paradigm, which employs a systematic approach to solving difficulties and challenges, is the answer to these concerns and challenges. 


    What is a  CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEM?


    The term CPS was established in 2006 by the National Science Foundation to characterize a complex, interdisciplinary, next-generation system that integrates embedded technology in the physical environment. 

    CPS is defined in the United States as the integration of embedded systems and physical components, in Europe as the communication between cloud and human, and in China as intelligence in sensing, processing, and control. 

    CPS has made considerable progress in recent years, but it still has a long way to go before reaching its full potential. 

    Sensing, analyzing, synthesizing, modelling, and control are rapidly evolving in engineering and research. 

    CPSs combine engineering and computer science to address concerns and challenges. 


    The following are the technical obstacles in bringing the two sectors together: 


    • Design: 

    1. Design is essential for achieving continuous integration, communication, and computation. 
    2. To satisfy the system requirements, standard architectures and design tools are necessary. 
    3. Architectures and approaches should provide data confidentiality, integrity, availability, and asset protection. 

    • Science and engineering: 

    1. The integration of cyber and physical components necessitates rapid sensing, processing, and control, all of which must be precise. 
    2. To make judgments and govern activities, enormous amounts of data must be processed quickly and efficiently. 
    3. Traditional centralized control does not have the requisite speed, hence dispersed control is essential. 
    4. The essential components are data sensing, data processing, and control. 


    What is a GENERALIZED CPS MODEL? 


    The physical layer comprises of the components required for CPS monitoring and control. 

    Equipment in the physical layer include generators, transformers, loads, and measurement devices. 


    The multi-input multi-output (MIMO) CPS model is represented as, 

    ẋ(t) = Ax(t) + Bu(t) (1.1) 

    y(t) = Cx(t) (1.2) 

    where, A is the state matrix, B is the input matrix, C is the output matrix, 

    x(t) is the state vector, u(t) is the input vector, y(t) is the output vector. 

    The control is achieved using input vector which is given by, 

    u(t) = Kx(t) (1.3) 

    where, K is the connection between cyber layer control and physical layer sensors. 



    What Is The CPS APPROACH TO SMART GRID?


    To accomplish CPS features, SG integrates physical components of the power grid network with the cyber layer. 

    Real and virtual systems are combined in SG, where events in physical systems are relayed as input to CPS control centers and simulated to assess physical system performance. 

    Communication channels enable dynamic collaboration between physical and cyber systems. 

    Parallel processing and distributed data aid in decision making via CPS layers. 


    The CPS will adapt, organize, and learn on its own, allowing it to react to faults, attacks, and emergencies in SG, making it secure and trustworthy. 

    The problems in the CPS part of the SG are that the system is time-critical, the components work together to ensure stability, voltage and frequency control, and quick reaction to uncertainties and disturbances. 

    CPS is used in SG to eliminate duplication and increase SG stability. 


    The primary functions of CPS in Singapore are as follows: 

    • Dependability 

    • Reliability 

    • Predictability 

    • Sustainability 

    • Security 

    • Interoperability 

    Many studies are being conducted to address the concerns related to SG and CPS. 

    The combination of SG and CPS is referred to as CPES. 


    What is the Architecture of a CPS Smart Grid?

    The physical component of the power system network, which varies from other object-oriented software, demands safety and dependability. 

    To enable the system to function in uncertain and unexpected settings, the CPS design must be particular for integrating cyber and physical components. 

    In these conditions, the software-based components perform well. 

    Because software platforms lack timing capabilities, redesigning computer architectures in light of power system features is essential. 

    It requires standards and frameworks in which physical, communication, and computing components interface on their own standards and are interfaced together. 

    Communication technology is required for efficient and effective interaction between physical and cyber layer components. 

    Space and time are two dimensions of communication that must be addressed. 

    They relate to the distance and time required for data transmission. 

    The several levels of communication are determined by the network size, and they are as follows: home area network, neighborhood area network, metropolitan area network, and wide area network. 

    Time delay, error pockets, and queue delays are all important real-time issues. 

    Modeling and Simulation: The modelling tool must be able to handle network standards, interoperability, hybrid modelling, and large-scale operation. 

    The SG of the future might be huge or small in size, with scattered sources and energy needs, and it must be run reliably and in a user-friendly way, requiring risk analysis, risk management, security, uncertainty analysis, and coordination. 


    How Is Cyber Security Enforced In a CPS Smart Grid?

    CPS must be secure, and any random failure or attack would be detrimental to the system. 

    Because of the employment of cyber components such as PMU and advanced metering infrastructure (AMI), the system is vulnerable to attack. 


    The SG must be designed to identify and mitigate cyber-attacks using an intrusion detection system (IDS). 

    IDS is classified into two types: 

    1. host-based IDS 
    2. and network-based IDS. 


    How does Distributed Computation occur on a CPS Smart Grid?

    In SG, a vast number of smart meters and sensors are positioned at different levels, each of which must process massive amounts of data sequentially. 

    Fault detection, power control and reconfiguration, management, and restoration in power networks are all time-sensitive, posing a problem in SG. 

    Data mining techniques ideal for dealing with massive amounts of data are the answer to these issues. 

    In SG, new computational techniques like as grid and cloud computing platforms are employed to execute sub- and local calculations. 

    Distributed Intelligence: The SGs use a multi-agent system to do large-scale computing (MAS). 

    An agent is a control entity that may communicate and interact with other components to achieve local/global objectives. 

    In MAS, a set of agents is used in a dispersed network to concentrate on different applications. 

    In SG, automation must be present at both the micro and macro operational levels in order to make requirements-based decisions. 

    SG is dependent on global optimization and local control, where global optimization has multiple goals and local control has one. 

    Because centralized optimization is ineffective for SG, distributed optimization solutions are necessary. 

    In the merging of global optimization with local control, MAS is employed to achieve global coordination. 


    How is Distributed Control achieved in a Smart Grid?

    As the number of components in SG increases, the system gets more complicated due to the presence of several levels of control and hierarchy. 

    Control goals are multi-objective, having global and local needs that may vary based on the operating conditions. 

    The control must generate data from physical components in order to assess and regulate the system's components. 

    Control in SG is built on the physical layer, the cyber layer, and the planning and operations layer. 

     


    What Is CPES?



    Power system analysis in contemporary systems is performed using computer models and is a current research area. 

    When computers were used for the power grid, new software to mimic the transmission and distribution system was created. 

    By building additional software, this system was upgraded to compute more complicated networks and to calculate quicker. 

    The study in the creation of new software aided in the construction of a distributed model of a power network, parallel processing, and system analysis. 

    Some current power system simulators, such as Siemens PSSE, are only used for transmission systems, while others, such as GridLab-D, are only used for distribution systems. 

    Recently, considerable research has been conducted in the field of co-simulation. 

    Many cloud-based software applications are utilized to simulate the network and run simulations. 

    Co-simulation combines continuous system and discrete event simulation to model and understand CPES behavior. 

    Diverse strategies, such as the common information model, have been used to integrate various systems. 

    These approaches are used to manage energy in distributed systems and subsystems. 

    Many researchers have used the CPS for power grid design to examine the reliability and security of the power system. 

    The study focuses on the difficulties in CPS modelling, design, and simulation. 

    CPS is utilized in a variety of applications, including management, smart buildings, cloud computing, surveillance, scheduling, monitoring, and transportation systems. 

    16 Any outage or blackout in the power system has a significant influence on the economy and society, making the functioning of the power grid important. 

    The CPES model is an interconnected structure meant to facilitate communication among stakeholders. 

    This model is not a CPES standard, but it contains information on numerous technologies and standards for the smart grid, such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and IEC. 

    This model may be used to create new technologies, standards, or algorithms, as well as to assess the operation of smart grids. 

    Future standards and technologies may be grown from current ones using the CPES paradigm. 


    The following reference models have been established and discussed in the literature: 


    • Open Systems Interconnection Reference Model. 

    • Agent Systems Reference Model. 

    • National Institute of Standards and Technology Reference Model. 



    WHAT ARE THE REQUIREMENTS AND CHALLENGES IN SMART GRID MODELING?


    Many issues in monitoring and controlling power networks have arisen in recent years as a result of technological advancements and the usage of dispersed energy sources. 

    Many PMUs have been installed to collect real-time data and transmit it to the control center. 

    PMUs collect data at a high sample rate. 

    To accomplish this high sample rate, a Wide Area Network (WAN) is employed to develop Wide Area Monitoring and Control (WAMC). 

    WAMC has several applications in power grids, including state estimation, contingency analysis, optimum power flow analysis, economic dispatch, and autonomous generation control. 

    These acquired data are used to operate systems using control algorithms, however all data must be monitored synchronously to prevent mistakes, which are done in the underlying framework. 

    As a result, the underlying infrastructure is a critical component for power system applications. 

    Applications may be both functional and nonfunctional. 

    The functional applications synchronize and coordinate data flow across dispersed network resources. 

    Scalability (support for a large number of PMUs and a communication network), latency and predictability (time sensitive), and reconfigurability are nonfunctional applications (addition or removal of components, nodes, or modifications in control algorithms). 


    WHAT IS THE  SMART GRID ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SGEMS)?


    The AMI devices in the SG paradigm are used for two-way communication between the utility and the user, allowing for demand control by shifting peak loads. 

    It is an optimum management system for monitoring and managing power production, consumption, and storage in SGs. 

    The network's communication infrastructure is utilized to gather data on load demand, generation, and forecasts from all sensors in order to enable remote monitoring and control for different operating modes, which is monitored in control centers. 

    The SGEMS not only delivers efficient generation use, but also energy storage and system management services. 



    What is the SGEMS ARCHITECTURE?


    The SGEMS center features a central controller that provides monitoring and control capabilities to the utility and customer based on communication. 

    The smart meter serves as a conduit for communication between the utility and the customer. 

    The data is collected by smart meters and sent to the control center, which receives the control signal to optimize demand management depending on generation. 

    Electric vehicles (EV) use SG electricity while simultaneously providing power back to SG in an emergency and acting as energy storage. 

    Because the distributed generation in the SG is integrated to accomplish generation management, the SG does not need to depend on electricity from the central grid. 

    Because renewable energy is inherently intermittent, energy storage systems play a critical role in maintaining power quality, efficiency, and dependability. 



    What are the FUNCTIONS OF SGEMS?


     The SGEMS must be adaptable in order to manage and regulate the SG and participate in the market while conserving energy and meeting load demand. 

    Control services are accessible to utilities and customers, who may choose services and preferences through a human-machine interface. 


    The following are the primary roles and descriptions of the SGEMS: 


    Monitoring: Provides access to data on energy production and demand Displays operating mode and status 

    Logging: Collect and preserve data on DER production, demand from loads, and energy storage system. 

    Control: There are two forms of control: direct control applied on equipment and remote control where consumers watch load patterns and control. 

    Alarm: An alarm is raised at the SGEMS centre with data on system anomalies discovered. 

    Management: Management improves the optimization and effective use of energy in Singapore. 

    It offers services including DER management and storage management. 


    What is the INFRASTRUCTURES OF SGEMS?

    A smart control center, smart meter, communication and networking system, energy storage, distributed generation, and other smart devices comprise the SGEMS infrastructure. 

    SGEMS can access, monitor, regulate, and optimize the performance of multiple distributed generations, loads, and other devices via these infrastructures. 

    SGEMS facilitates load and generation integration via two-way communication. 



    COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK:

    The SGEMS are based on hardware communication, such as powerline communication and human-machine interface. 

    Researchers are working on new WAN communication networks. 

    The SGEMS communication network must fulfil the IEEE 802.15.4 WAN specifications. 

    The ability to include Bluetooth technology in communication may be employed in SGEMS as well. 

    To accomplish system functioning, the major components of SGEMS are the processor for applications, communication, user, sensor, and load interface. 


    THE SMART METER:

    Smart meters are used to assess consumer energy use and production, as well as power generation, and they employ two-way communication to send data to and receive signals from the control center. 

    Smart meters' primary features include detecting energy use, two-way communication, transmitting data and receiving instructions, smart load shedding transition in the event of a failure, and data collecting. 


    CENTER FOR SMART ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (EMS). 

    The Smart Energy Management System (EMS) center is the brain of the whole smart grid and is responsible for implementing the energy management system in SG. 

    The smart EMS center's primary functions are as follows: receiving messages sent by smart meters and control panels, automated demand response, human-machine interface, online monitoring, scalability, integrating distributed resources and energy storage, forecasting renewable generation, and optimal control. 


    What is the scope for Renewable Sources in IN SMART GRIDS?


    Since the 1990s, the use of renewable energy has increased significantly in a variety of industrial, commercial, and residential settings. 

    Only 31.1% of all energy output in the globe is produced by renewable energy. 

    The research in the area of EMS for a renewable energy system is progressing rapidly. 

    The necessity to reduce emissions in energy generation paves the way for the development of sustainable approaches that make use of renewable energy sources. 



    How is the USE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES IN EMS?

    Solar energy is the most environmentally friendly and inexhaustible renewable energy source. 

    Solar energy is used in a variety of ways, including solar heaters, solar PV, and so on. 

    Because of their ease of installation, solar heaters are often employed in home applications. 

    Solar PV and solar concentrators are used to generate electricity. 

    Electricity generating need large-scale investment to meet bulk power requirements. 

    Solar energy is used in two ways: 

    1. solar thermal, which converts sunlight into thermal energy and generates electricity, 
    2. and solar PV, which generates electricity directly from sunlight. 

    Solar energy is widely employed because of its copious supply of sunshine and minimal maintenance. 

    Because solar energy is only accessible during the day, energy storage is required. 

    Charge controllers are required to safeguard energy storage devices from overcharging and discharging. 

    Wind energy is another renewable energy source that is used on a big and small scale. 

    Wind speeds of 2-15 m/s can be used to generate electricity. 



    What are FUTURE DIFFICULTIES AND SCOPE OF SMART GRIDS? 


     In this part, important difficulties and possibilities in the SG's CPS are discussed in terms of ecosystems, big data, cloud computing, and the Internet of Things. 


    • Ecosystem Perspective: 

    • SG growth is inextricably linked to the environment and social system. 
    • The flora and fauna, as well as climate changes, are examples of nature, environment, and ecosystems that are influenced by SG improvement. 


    • Big Data: 

    • Big data is utilized in data collection and analysis. 
    • Volume, velocity, veracity, variance, and value are the five key features of big data. 


    • Cloud Computing: 

    • In SG, dispersed resources in real-time management must be met on time. 
    • Cloud computing is a model in which services like compute, networking, and storage serve as resources. 
    • It provides the benefits of self-service, resource sharing, flexibility, and it boosts security and overcomes privacy problems. 

    • Internet of Things (IoT): 

    • The Internet of Things (IoT) is the expansion of Internet services caused by the spread of RFID, sensors, smart devices, and "things" on the Internet. 
    • IoT is rapidly expanding, with 50 billion devices expected to be connected to the internet by 2020. 
    • The progress of IoT results in the advancement of IoE. 



     FINAL REMARKS AND THOUGHTS ON THE FUTURE OF  SMART GRIDS.


     The smart grid environment with EMS plays an important role in the efficient use of power and demand response. 

    The smart SGEMS with wireless networks and smart sensing element technology raises the bar for SG standards. 

    Because of its ease of use and simplicity, SGEMS has been more popular in recent years. 

    The present smart grid infrastructure, which includes two-way communication, metering, and monitoring devices, lays the groundwork for smart SGEMS applications. 

    The extensive use of SGEMS in the future may change the manner of electricity use and renewable energy utilization inside the power network. 

    Due to geographical and climatic conditions, alternative energy may be the dominant contributor in renewable energy applications, whereas wind and biomass contribute comparably little. 

    The use of renewable energy reveals that energy savings from transmission energy losses and conventional installation may be realized. 

    The design of a CPS is more difficult than developing physical and cyber components one by one. 

    For CPSs, the required behavior of machine parts must be specified in terms of their impact on the physical environment. 

    As a result, modelling requires a unifying framework that allows for consistency and a low-overhead style.


    ~ Jai Krishna Ponnappan.

    Find Jai on Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram


    You may also read more about Green Technologies and Renewable Energy Systems here.



    References And Further Reading:


    1. Amin, M. Minimizing Failure While Maintaining Efficiency of Complex Inter-active Networks and Systems: EPRI and US Department of Defense Complex Interactive Networks/Systems Initiative; First Annual Report, 2000. 

    2. Haase, P. Intelli Grid: A Smart Network of Power. EPRI J. 2005, 27, 17–25. 

    3. Profiling and Mapping of Intelligent Grid R & D Programs. EPRI 2006.

    4. European Smart-grids Technology Platform: Vision and Strategy for Europe’s Electricity Networks of the Future. Directorate-General for Research Sustainable Energy Systems, 2006. 

    5. Davis, C. et al. Scada Cyber Security Testbed Development. In NAPS. IEEE, 2006; pp 483–488. 

    6. Schneider, K. et al. Assessment of Interactions Between Power and Telecommunications Infrastructures. IEEE TPWRS 2006. 

    7. Sun, Y. et al. Verifying Noninterference in a Cyber-physical System the Advanced Electric Power Grid. In QSIC; IEEE 2007; pp 363–369. 

    8. Karnouskos, S. Cyber-physical Systems in the Smartgrid. In INDIN. IEEE, 2011; pp 20–23. 

    9. Giani, A. et al. The Viking Project: An Initiative on Resilient Control of Power Networks. In ISRCS. IEEE, 2009; pp 31–35. 

    10. Mo, Y. et al. Cyber–physical Security of a Smart Grid Infrastructure. Proc. IEEE 2012, 100 (1), 195–209. 

    11. Susuki, Y. et al. A Hybrid System Approach to the Analysis and Design of Power Grid Dynamic Performance. Proc. IEEE 2012. 

    12. Saber, A.; Venayagamoorthy, G. Efficient Utilization of Renewable Energy Sources by Gridable Vehicles in Cyber-physical Energy Systems. Syst. J. IEEE 2010, 4 (3), 285–294. 

    13. Zhu, Q. et al. Robust and Resilient Control Design for Cyber-physical Systems with an Application to Power Systems. In CDC-ECC, 2011. 

    14. Hadjsaid, N. et al. Modeling Cyber and Physical Interdependencies-application in ICT and Power Grids. In IEEE/PES PSCE, 2009; pp 1–6. 

    15. Zhao, J. et al. Cyber Physical Power Systems: Architecture, Implementation Techniques and Challenges. Dianli Xitong Zidonghua (Autom. Electric Power Syst.) 2010, 34 (16), 1–7. 

    16. NIST Special Publication 1108R2. NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards, Release 2.0, 2012; http://www.nist.gov/smartgrid/upload/ NIST Framework Release 2-0 corr.pdf 

    17. Liu, Y.; Ning, P.; Reiter, M. False Data Injection Attacks against State Estimation in  Electric Power Grids. ACM TISSEC 2011. 


    Artificial Intelligence - Who Is Sherry Turkle?

     


     

     

    Sherry Turkle(1948–) has a background in sociology and psychology, and her work focuses on the human-technology interaction.

    While her study in the 1980s focused on how technology affects people's thinking, her work in the 2000s has become more critical of how technology is utilized at the expense of building and maintaining meaningful interpersonal connections.



    She has employed artificial intelligence in products like children's toys and pets for the elderly to highlight what people lose out on when interacting with such things.


    Turkle has been at the vanguard of AI breakthroughs as a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the creator of the MIT Initiative on Technology and the Self.

    She highlights a conceptual change in the understanding of AI that occurs between the 1960s and 1980s in Life on the Screen: Identity inthe Age of the Internet (1995), substantially changing the way humans connect to and interact with AI.



    She claims that early AI paradigms depended on extensive preprogramming and employed a rule-based concept of intelligence.


    However, this viewpoint has given place to one that considers intelligence to be emergent.

    This emergent paradigm, which became the recognized mainstream view by 1990, claims that AI arises from a much simpler set of learning algorithms.

    The emergent method, according to Turkle, aims to emulate the way the human brain functions, assisting in the breaking down of barriers between computers and nature, and more generally between the natural and the artificial.

    In summary, an emergent approach to AI allows people to connect to the technology more easily, even thinking of AI-based programs and gadgets as children.



    Not just for the area of AI, but also for Turkle's study and writing on the subject, the rising acceptance of the emerging paradigm of AI and the enhanced relatability it heralds represents a significant turning point.


    Turkle started to employ ethnographic research techniques to study the relationship between humans and their gadgets in two edited collections, Evocative Objects: Things We Think With (2007) and The Inner History of Devices (2008).


    She emphasized in her book The Inner History of Devices that her intimate ethnography, or the ability to "listen with a third ear," is required to go past the advertising-based clichés that are often employed when addressing technology.


    This method comprises setting up time for silent meditation so that participants may think thoroughly about their interactions with their equipment.


    Turkle used similar intimate ethnographic approaches in her second major book, Alone Together

    Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other (2011), to argue that the increasing connection between people and the technology they use is harmful.

    These issues are connected to the increased usage of social media as a form of communication, as well as the continuous degree of familiarity and relatability with technology gadgets, which stems from the emerging AI paradigm that has become practically omnipresent.

    She traced the origins of the dilemma back to early pioneers in the field of cybernetics, citing, for example, Norbert Weiner's speculations on the idea of transmitting a human person across a telegraph line in his book God & Golem, Inc.(1964).

    Because it reduces both people and technology to information, this approach to cybernetic thinking blurs the barriers between them.



    In terms of AI, this implies that it doesn't matter whether the machines with which we interact are really intelligent.


    Turkle claims that by engaging with and caring for these technologies, we may deceive ourselves into feeling we are in a relationship, causing us to treat them as if they were sentient.

    In a 2006 presentation titled "Artificial Intelligence at 50: From Building Intelligence to Nurturing Sociabilities" at the Dartmouth Artificial Intelligence Conference, she recognized this trend.

    She identified the 1997 Tamagotchi, 1998 Furby, and 2000 MyReal Baby as early versions of what she refers to as relational artifacts, which are more broadly referred to as social machines in the literature.

    The main difference between these devices and previous children's toys is that these devices come pre-animated and ready for a relationship, whereas previous children's toys required children to project a relationship onto them.

    Turkle argues that this change is about our human weaknesses as much as it is about computer capabilities.

    In other words, just caring for an item increases the likelihood of not only seeing it as intelligent but also feeling a connection to it.

    This sense of connection is more relevant to the typical person engaging with these technologies than abstract philosophic considerations concerning the nature of their intelligence.



    Turkle delves more into the ramifications of people engaging with AI-based technologies in both Alone Together and Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age (2015).


    She provides the example of Adam in Alone Together, who appreciates the appreciation of the AI bots he controls over in the game Civilization.

    Adam appreciates the fact that he is able to create something fresh when playing.

    Turkle, on the other hand, is skeptical of this interaction, stating that Adam's playing isn't actual creation, but rather the sensation of creation, and that it's problematic since it lacks meaningful pressure or danger.

    In Reclaiming Conversation, she expands on this point, suggesting that social partners simply provide a perception of camaraderie.

    This is important because of the value of human connection and what may be lost in relationships that simply provide a sensation or perception of friendship rather than true friendship.

    Turkle believes that this transition is critical.


    She claims that although connections with AI-enabledtechnologies may have certain advantages, they pale in contrast to what is missing: 

    • the complete complexity and inherent contradictions that define what it is to be human.


    A person's connection with an AI-enabled technology is not as intricate as one's interaction with other individuals.


    Turkle claims that as individuals have become more used to and dependent on technology gadgets, the definition of friendship has evolved.


    • People's expectations for companionship have been simplified as a result of this transformation, and the advantages that one wants to obtain from partnerships have been reduced.
    • People now tend to associate friendship only with the concept of interaction, ignoring the more nuanced sentiments and arguments that are typical in partnerships.
    • By engaging with gadgets, one may form a relationship with them.
    • Conversations between humans have become merely transactional as human communication has shifted away from face-to-face conversation and toward interaction mediated by devices. 

    In other words, the most that can be anticipated is engagement.



    Turkle, who has a background in psychoanalysis, claims that this kind of transactional communication allows users to spend less time learning to view the world through the eyes of another person, which is a crucial ability for empathy.


    Turkle argues we are in a robotic period in which people yearn for, and in some circumstances prefer, AI-based robotic companionship over that of other humans, drawing together these numerous streams of argument.

    For example, some people enjoy conversing with their iPhone's Siri virtual assistant because they aren't afraid of being judged by it, as evidenced by a series of Siri commercials featuring celebrities talking to their phones.

    Turkle has a problem with this because these devices can only respond as if they understand what is being said.


    AI-based gadgets, on the other hand, are confined to comprehending the literal meanings of data stored on the device.

    They can decipher the contents of phone calendars and emails, but they have no idea what any of this data means to the user.

    There is no discernible difference between a calendar appointment for car maintenance and one for chemotherapy for an AI-based device.

    A person may lose sight of what it is to have an authentic dialogue with another human when entangled in a variety of these robotic connections with a growing number of technologies.


    While Reclaiming Communication documents deteriorating conversation skills and decreasing empathy, it ultimately ends on a positive note.

    Because people are becoming increasingly dissatisfied with their relationships, there may be a chance for face-to-face human communication to reclaim its vital role.


    Turkle's ideas focus on reducing the amount of time people spend on their phones, but AI's involvement in this interaction is equally critical.


    • Users must accept that their virtual assistant connections will never be able to replace face-to-face interactions.
    • This will necessitate being more deliberate in how one uses devices, prioritizing in-person interactions over the faster and easier interactions provided by AI-enabled devices.


    ~ Jai Krishna Ponnappan

    Find Jai on Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram


    You may also want to read more about Artificial Intelligence here.



    See also: 

    Blade Runner; Chatbots and Loebner Prize; ELIZA; General and Narrow AI; Moral Turing Test; PARRY; Turing, Alan; 2001: A Space Odyssey.


    References And Further Reading

    • Haugeland, John. 1997. “What Is Mind Design?” Mind Design II: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, edited by John Haugeland, 1–28. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Searle, John R. 1997. “Minds, Brains, and Programs.” Mind Design II: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, edited by John Haugeland, 183–204. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Turing, A. M. 1997. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind Design II: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, edited by John Haugeland, 29–56. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.



    What Is Artificial General Intelligence?

    Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is defined as the software representation of generalized human cognitive capacities that enables the ...